Water company environmental spending should be aligned with new farm subsidies, says think tank

Posted: Thursday 25th October 2018

Farm subsidies have encouraged agriculture that causes extensive water pollution which water companies have had to clean up. A new Green Alliance report says that, to save unnecessary public spending and keep water bills down, the UK’s new post-Brexit farm subsidy scheme, aimed at environmental restoration, should be better aligned with water companies’ environmental spending.

The government’s commitment to restore the environment within a generation requires major new investment in environmental protection and restoration. A new report, released by Green Alliance, finds that the cost of this scheme could be lowered if payments to farmers were aligned with water company investment, rather than allowing them to continue to clash.

The report says it is important to act quickly. Currently, 84 per cent of England’s waters are failing to meet environmental standards.

The Environment Agency estimates that restoring three quarters of water bodies in England to good status by 2027 will bring £22.5 billion in benefits to England. But significant investment of £17.5 billion is needed to realise them.

The report states agriculture and land management are responsible for nearly a third of failures to meet water targets, mainly arising from fertilisers, manures and pesticide pollution. [4] While the government paid £36.6 billion in basic subsidy payments to farmers between 1995 and 2015, water companies spent £20 billion in the same period on environmental improvements to water, often cleaning up pollution caused by agriculture.

Investing in landscape-scale catchment management schemes to reduce pollution would cut the cost of treating water over the long term. For example, reducing pollution by enough to achieve just a 25 per cent reduction in operating costs would bring savings of £1.6 million for a nitrate removal plant and £7.5 million for a pesticide removal plant over 25 years. Although savings would not apply to all plants, some large water companies operate over 100 treatment facilities.

The report says that future public and private investment should be planned together and focus on whole catchment schemes aimed at landscape scale sustainable land management. Unlike pollution treatment plants, catchment management measures, such as planting cover crops and restoring wetlands, provide clean water and contribute to wider environmental goals providing vital habitat for wildlife and reducing flood and drought risks.




Read the magazine online

December 2018

About the magazine »
Magazine archive »


Advertisements

Information for advertisers »

ATI UK
Harvey Communications Prominent Fluid Controls buttonwood marketing Huber Water Aid Pulsar Button June 13 Verder British Water wateractive
Sykes Pumps