Construction industry calls for health and safety simplification

Posted: Tuesday 27th September 2011

The Construction Industry Council (CIC) and the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) have called for simplification of health and safety regulation to help improve productivity in the construction industry, which accounts for approximately six percent of Britain’s economic output.

In a joint consultation response to Professor Lofstedt’s review of health and safety legislation, the bodies say that while they see no need for the abolishment of any legislation, some regulations could be merged or simplified to reduce unnecessary bureaucracy and burdens on the construction industry.

A key concern is the misinterpretation of the Approved Codes of Practice (ACoPs) - which seek to provide more detail on the regulations. ICE and CIC say that uncertainty of how to apply the regulations has lead to over-implementation of safety procedures, especially among smaller businesses that make up a significant proportion of the industry and for whom the extra administration is an unwelcome burden.

Chair of the ICE health and safety expert panel and joint ICE/ CIC working panel Mike Battman said: “The construction industry has one of the highest accident and fatality rates in the UK, however the current guidance does not sufficiently take into account its unique requirements. We strongly believe that a simplified, more tailored approach – with clarification around specific requirements for our industry – would help this crucial industry be more productive, and ultimately be of more value to our long-term economic growth.”

The group also calls for clarity around the principle of what is ‘reasonably practicable’ which was introduced to provide a guide to what level of risk assessment and prevention duty holders must implement. However the consultation says that gross uncertainty of how this principle applies, especially to construction designers, is undermining the efficiency and productivity of the industry.

Peter Caplehorn, Chairman of the CIC Health and Safety Committee and working panel member said: “In a time when industry should be looking for efficiency and added value this uncertainty is an unacceptable and wasteful use of resource, hampering progress on vital infrastructure projects. The legislation urgently needs to be re-assessed to enable industry to execute its legal responsibilities effectively, better preventing accidents and ill-health but also freeing up significant resource and time which can then be focused on improving project outcomes and driving down costs.”

Full list of ICE and CIC’s recommendations:

1. All regulations and ACoPs need to be regularly reviewed with input from professionals working in that field
2. In places, Regulations and, more generally, ACOPs need to be simplified and/or their requirements clarified to reduce opportunities for misinterpretation - with input from professionals working in that field.
3. Benefit could be obtained by consolidating a number of regulations and in avoiding ‘amendment’ regulations.
4. An urgent review is required to bring improved definition to ‘reasonable practicability’
5. A specific review is required to consider the application of ‘reasonable practicability’ as applied to construction designers
6. We do not believe that inappropriate litigation or compensation is related to the current regulations.




Read the magazine online

December 2018

About the magazine »
Magazine archive »


Advertisements

Information for advertisers »

NO DIG 2018
Harvey Communications Prominent Fluid Controls Pulsar Button June 13 British Water Huber Verder buttonwood marketing Water Aid wateractive
Grundfos 2018